My awesome partner loves to test my brain sometimes. At one point he was reading the book How Would You Move Mount Fuji, a book about the problem solving interview questions that companies like Microsoft and other big companies would use to “test” their potential employees. Now, it’s not always about getting the correct answer, but also about the thinking process that the interviewees used to achieve their answer.
There was one problem in particular that I remember being asked…
There is a row of 100 lockers in a school hallway; all of the locker doors are closed. A first whistle blows, and all the doors toggle — meaning if the door is open, then it will close, and if it is closed, it will open. On the second whistle, every two locker doors will toggle. On the third whistle, ever three locker doors will toggle. On the fourth whistle, every four… and so on, until the 100th whistle blows. After the 100th whistle, how many locker doors will be open?
Now, I’m sure there are many people smarter than me that will solve this almost instantly. I didn’t. But that’s not my point. What I did do is something is resort back to what I do know … using my fingers. It may sound kiddish, but it worked. I made the problem into a much smaller problem, thinking of only the first ten lockers and the first ten whistles (since I only had ten fingers), then used my fingers to track what happened until I noticed the pattern. From there, the solution made sense both logically and mathematically.
So, I guess my question is this. How do we teach this type of thinking in our classrooms?
I say this a lot in my classroom, and I remember reading it on another post from samjshah.com… “Take what you don’t know, and turn it into what you DO know.” I feel this concept of thinking and learning is more important than any content math standard being tested, because this is what matters. Everyone eventually forgets the much of the math they learned. But learn to think like this, and math will suddenly have purpose.
I’ve written and deleted two long comments for this post, now. I guess I just want to say: please everyone answer Justin because I want to know! I’ve been reading math teacher blogs for 2 years now and I still have zilch on this.
There is the goal of this: http://prezi.com/156873/
And the reality of: time constraints and the race to finish the curriculum
The only course I’ve figured out how to do this sort of fun problem solving with is the multivariable calculus class, because I have no restrictions on what and how I teach and no other teacher to match up with. So it’s semi-collaborative problem sets and fun diversions all the way.
But Algebra 2? Calculus? I freely admit that I don’t teach honest to god true problem solving skills because I’m focusing on if they have individual smaller skills so we can move forward.
So someone, out there in the blogospherical zeitgeist, if you have something that works on the ground to teach problem solving skills without totally abandoning having a formal curricula, holla!
The only thing I can think of, and I haven’t done this, is every two or three weeks or so on a Friday give out a problem like the locker one to the class. And tell them they can work alone or together, but if a certain number of them come in with a solution or a worthy attempt to a solution to one of these good problems, the class gets some sort of reward. And then for the first 15 minutes of class let students talk about their (right and failed) approaches.
I know if I offered the best 2 solutions to be hung in the classroom, I’d definitely get some kids working on the problem who would want that sort of accolade…
Sam.
By: samjshah on August 23, 2009
at 7:06 pm
Poyla’s classic “How to Solve It” is full of tips for how to actually teach this kind of thing, but I suppose it mostly just comes down to giving students good problems and making them fend for themselves for a bit.
Sam is right that it’s hard to find time for this kind of practice though. It helps to find problems that use the skills you’re trying to teach.
By: Alison Blank on August 24, 2009
at 6:42 am
I have read Polya’s “How to Solve It”, and I do like how he approaches teaching problem solving. But as both of you said, it’s very difficult to find the time to actually go through each step and give them time to struggle.
I do like Sam’s idea of giving problems occasionally and offer rewards for solutions or valid attempts at a solution. It’s difficult to find students in my classes that are motivated enough to try, but I think it may work in an Honor’s class at my school.
I guess my issue also is the tests. Even if I did have the time to integrate more problem solving lessons and activities into the curriculum, we aren’t measured by a student’s ability to solve a problem they’ve never seen before! We know what’s going to be on our state tests. And frankly, problem solving is DIFFICULT, so even if it was a big part of the curriculum, it would take much more than a year for some students to be able to learn to think that way.
So when we have our tests quickly approaching, what would nearly every teacher decide to to do? Practice the skills that we know will appear on the test and that assesses how well we are “teaching”? Or will we have them develop a skill that seems hardly valued at the high school level, yet gives students infinite potential in the working world?
Unfortunately, as much as we try to incorporate more problem solving techniques throughout the year, in the end, this gets pushed aside and focus is put back on improving test scores the way we know how to… by drilling students to perform problems and skills that we know they WILL be tested on.
By: JT on August 24, 2009
at 10:30 am
Lots of practice, I think! Teach methods like making a picture, solving a simpler problem and looking for patterns, using logic, work backwards, etc. And then give lots of problems.
Like so many others, this is a skill learned only by lots of practice!
Depending on the grade level of your kids, you might consider signing up your class for Alcumus over at The Art of Problem Solving which provides lots of practice and instruction for counting and combinatorics problems, appropriate IMO for about grades 5-10 (and older if the kids have little experience with problem solving and/or combinatorics)
By: mathmom on August 25, 2009
at 9:27 pm
Make time. Not every lesson need eat up exactly 43, 45, 51, 52, 55 or however many minutes long your periods are.
To open though, give them an outline for problem solving, and give them a problem. Could be the lockers. Throw away the period on just that problem, giving them lots of time. Make sure to look back, discuss, find alternate solutions, look for related problems, maybe a formula, etc.
Then, find lessons that don’t take your full period. Something can be knocked off in 15? Great. That’s a half hour problem solving session available. If you could squeeze one in once a month it would awesome.
Finally, you can ask much littler questions with the same flavor. Once they get used to the fact that you will throw them non-standard stuff, they will react better to strange looking short questions (either on topic or off-topic. I like off-topic better).
I use some of Dave Marain’s middle school stuff as quickie problem solving for high school students. You know http://mathnotations.blogspot.com don’t you?
By: Jonathan on August 30, 2009
at 10:05 am
[...] Published October 3, 2009 Problem Solving , pedagogy Leave a Comment A while back, Justin Tolentino had a post asking how others might go about teaching problem solving strategies. Great [...]
By: Intro To Problem Solving « Questions? on October 3, 2009
at 9:15 am
[...] been thinking about these issues since my first year of teaching. Earlier this year, Justin Tolentino wrote a post that struck a nerve (as you can see from my comment) about my frustration about not knowing how to [...]
By: Problem Solving versus Solving Problems « Continuous Everywhere but Differentiable Nowhere on November 16, 2009
at 7:38 pm